According to me cases somewhat would be like:
It's not clear which repository you are migrating to TFS from? It is also not clear why to use Microsoft technologies (available in view of TFS) when there are repositories that have proven themselves to be excellent? For example GIT, SVN, etc.
But if you really want to use Visual Studio Test Professional, then the Microsoft documentation says that there is such a possibility: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/vsts/build-release/test/continuous-test-java
I had a similar situation in one of the projects. A separate test database is created before starting the tests and the structure of the prod database is copied into it and filled with fake data. Then it is removed.
Tests use a mock object to work with a database, where a test database is substituted instead of a prod.
Sometimes you need to run non-destructive tests on existing records in a prod or stage database; or if it is not convenient to update the test data - you can switch the used database.
I am wondering whether @FindBy annotation accepts xpath from properties or object repository file?
No, As far as I know, java annotations only accepts constant values like string literals etc. So If you use @FindBy annotation, you need to put selector as a string literal like:
@FindBy(css = "tbody[id$='some_css_in_here']")
About second question
Adding all selectors in properties file seemed much confusing to me since, after some time, too much selectors will be displayed in single properties file and you may have a hard time to remember which css selector belongs to which page (you can add comments to the properties file, but it is an additional work)
Although, putting css selectors into the page objects is much more readable for me, since during project, it will be easier to identify which css selectors belong to which page.
Like: Css selectors related with login page, will be located in LoginPage.java page object class.
Regards..
Firstly, I would be careful when communicating this type of relationship between test cases and your testing, because, test cases are not testing. Promoting otherwise may cause issues both for the stakeholders who won't understand what is happening and for the tester who will have less leverage to promote deep testing.
Testing is the process of evaluating a product by learning about it through experiencing, exploring, and experimenting, which includes to some degree: questioning, study, modeling, observation, inference, etc., not the process of making evaluations by applying algorithmic decision rules to specific observations of a product (aka pure scripting - test cases).
If they know a bit about testing, stakeholders don't want to know about test cases, but about your discoveries about the status of the product. Thus what you need to track is what makes the time you spend trying to discover important facts about the status of the product.
One framework to do so is the Session-Based Testing Management. You can summarize your testing session using a sheet as below. In it, you can register how much time you spent exploring the product, applying sensemaking of the behavior of the product. how much time you spent preparing your environment and product for testing, and how much time you were focused on the charter versus exploring areas that seemed more interesting.
This information can then be aggregated to uncover if some of these activities are usually a bottleneck for testing (Setup and sensemaking are usually bottlenecks in environments with low testability).
Having this summary can help you to forecast the testing time for future similar activities (investigation on same code base area, same time of refactoring, same downstream dependencies, etc).
IWebElement element = driver.FindElement(By.Id("element-id"));
WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
wait.Until(ExpectedConditions.TextToBePresentInElement(element, "text"));
use webdriver wait :https://www.lambdatest.com/blog/explicit-fluent-wait-in-selenium-c/
https://riptutorial.com/selenium-webdriver/example/15496/different-types-of-explicit-wait-conditions
I'd like to create and ask about best framework for backend end-to-end tests. This is microservice architecture software and the services communicates via REST API and Apache Kafka. What would be best frameworks/libraries for such technologies? The most important is reliability and interoperability of the system.
I tried to execute the code you have mentioned in the question's description and found that it wasn't able to locate the element Login button.
I modified the line to find the login button from,
WebElement login = driver.findElement(By.partialLinkText("Login"));
To
WebElement login = driver.findElement(By.xpath("//*[@id=\"applyform\"]/div/button"));
And it worked perfectly.
Here is the complete code,
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
System.setProperty("webdriver.chrome.driver", "/home/milin/Milin/Tools/Automation/Selenium/drivers/chromedriver");
WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver();
driver.manage().window().maximize();
driver.get("https://www.lambdatest.com/automation-demos/");
WebElement username = driver.findElement(By.xpath("//*[@id=\"username\"]"));
WebElement password = driver.findElement(By.xpath("//*[@id=\"password\"]"));
WebElement login = driver.findElement(By.xpath("//*[@id=\"applyform\"]/div/button"));
username.sendKeys("lambda");
password.sendKeys("lambda123");
Thread.sleep(2000);
login.submit();
Thread.sleep(5000);
driver.close();
}
if width > length
then
biggest_dimension = width
if height > width
then
biggest_dimension = height
end_if
else
biggest_dimension = length
if height > length
then
biggest_dimension = height
end_if
end_if
Given the following fragment of code, how many tests are required for 100% decision coverage? According to my calculation the answer should be 6 as I am calcualting true and false for each if condition but the actual answer is 4. can someone tell me how it got as 4?
I am having trouble with this ISTQB practice question. I understand how the answer (C) was reached, but I don't understand one of the explanations (for option "A"). Here is the question:
Evaluating testability of the test basis and test items takes place during which phase of the testing process?
- (A) Test design
- (B) Test planning, monitoring and control
- (C) Test analysis
- (D) Test implementation
This question is from the book "A study guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus".
At the end of this question the author says that the correct answer is "C", and explains why the others are not, but my problem is only the explanation for the option "A":
"A" is incorrect - if we want to check the testability of the test items, we need to have these objects in place, which takes place in the test design phase. So this phase is too early for testability evaluation.
("B" is incorrect from the same reason that "A". "D" is incorrect, because during the implementation phase we implement tests, so we need to know that test objects are testable - hence, this phase is too late for evaluating the testability.)
So, I can't understand what it means that "we need to have these objects in place, which takes place in the test design phase". As per the syllabus test item is part of a test object used in the test process, and test object is the component or system to be tested. And as I know we create test cases, identify test data, design the test environment, etc. during the test design phase, but I can't find anything concretely about test items or test objects that takes place during the test design phase. So if somebody could explain it to me what could it mean in more detail, I would be very grateful.
I asked this on https://community.postman.com/t/postman-proxy-does-not-save-urls-of-some-resources/19376, but no answers this far.
I’ve turned on Postman Proxy and configured Firefox (Tools -> Options -> Network, Settings, then Manual configuration of proxy servers) to use 127.0.0.1, port 5555. I can see that it works at least to some extent, because the actual URLs of addresses entered in the Firefox address bar show up in Postman (in the collection created for this purpose). I’m not sure if Postman should gather the all children URLs (that is, the URLs that are visible in the browser after pressing F12 -> Network), though - and my question is: should it? I’m confused because some (few) URLs does show up in the collection, but other do not.
I put the screenshot showing the situation so possibly it could be easier to figure out what is my point (the URL of the loaded page: http://www.kociesprawy.pl/magazyn/czytelnia_artykuly_w_kocich_sprawach/koty_i_ludzie/kocie_blogi_-_w_krainie_pieciu_kotow/).
After loading the above mentioned page in Firefox, I can see that, for example, the file koty-1.jpg is downloaded. Nothing like that in the collection. I've tried to figure this out on my own using screenshots, videos and so on, but I can't unequivocally settle this.
Edit: PDHide (so perhaps others too) supposed that I confused settings of how Postman's requests should be proxied with Postman built-in proxy for capturing the requests. In fact I didn't, I've configured what he has shown on the screenshot, but with the difference that I save resources to a collection, not to the history. If you want to confirm if in your case this Postman capturing function works as in mine, then you can just do the instructions https://learning.postman.com/docs/sending-requests/capturing-request-data/capturing-http-requests/ "Step 1: Set up the proxy in Postman" but setting saving to a collection, configure Firefox to make requests to port 5555 and then just make request to http://www.kociesprawy.pl/magazyn/czytelnia_artykuly_w_kocich_sprawach/koty_i_ludzie/kocie_blogi_-_w_krainie_pieciu_kotow/ and check the collection.
I think you can use the Appium driver.get_screenshot_as_base64() command described in the documentation: http://appium.io/docs/en/commands/session/screenshot/
Now you should have a screenshot of the full page. You can ask the element its location and crop the screenshot. This is described for Python and Selenium in detail here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15018372/how-to-take-partial-screenshot-with-selenium-webdriver-in-python
Although I didnt try it myself I think the cropping should work the same for Appuim based elements and screenshots.
RabbitMQ is part of the web-application, I dont think ZAP is designed to be used as a security scan between parts of a web-application. It focuses on the traffic between the browser and the web-application. I asume that the browser does not directly communicate with RabbitMQ. Wondering if you are looking at the right tool.
At its core, ZAP is what is known as a “man-in-the-middle proxy.” It stands between the tester’s browser and the web application so that it can intercept and inspect messages sent between browser and web application, modify the contents if needed, and then forward those packets on to the destination. It can be used as a stand-alone application, and as a daemon process.
