As per google on their page: Secure device: Locks your phone with your PIN, pattern, or password. If you don't have a lock, you can set one. To help someone return your phone to you, you can add a message or phone number to the lock screen. Erase device: Permanently deletes all data on your phone (but might not delete SD cards). After you erase, Find My Device won't work on the phone. Important: If you find your phone after erasing, you'll likely need your Google Account password to use it again. As the last line suggests - the password has to be Google Account Password If you are looking at completely remove the password option from phone again you can do this... Procedure Open Settings. Tap Security (on Samsung phones, tap Lock Screen) Tap Screen Lock. Note: If prompted, enter your current password, PIN, or pattern. Choose your screen lock preference: none, swipe, password, PIN, or pattern. (Choose None here) Tap Done.

Google usually does not use passwords for authentication on Android. Only for the initial account set-up you have to enter username and password which is then sent to the Google authentication server but not stored on your phone. If username and password were correct the authentication server sends back an long term oAuth authentication token (looks like a long string of random characters - usually 50 character or longer) which used for authentication and updated periodically by the server (about every month). Therefore changing the password has no effect on your Android device. Do logout devices from your Google account Google provides a web page where you cans see all active devices and where you can log out each device if want: http://google.com/devices

I found the answer in the comments to my question: Appearently, you don't have to put in an "encryption password" when booting up anymore. It was required with FDE (Full Device Encryption), but is not with FBE (File-Based Encryption). I installed a custom recovery and tried to decrypt my data and drum-roll: it works! I can only decrypt data when using my current android-lockscreen password. Thanks a lot!

There should be an organizer, who will invite the people they wants. To make it easier to send multiple invitations at once you can introduce groups. So then organizer can send an invitation to the whole group, let's say "Elm Street neighbours" or "My closest friends". There can any amount of groups, and everyone can be in any number of different groups. Anyone can see only matches either open-to-everyone or to which they has an invitation. Neither password nor link is needed. And then you can introduce other features, like "can other group members invite new participants" and so on.

From what I know this is mainly a server side reason. (Not all servers can handle an e-mail and they use the first page to find on which server you should be authenticated). I saw a similar question on another stackexchange (maybe superuser or serverfault, I can't find it) not long ago which describes more precisely the reasons. EDIt: I found the question I was thinking of : https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/257407/is-it-more-secure-to-ask-only-for-the-username-before-the-password

If the purpose of the meter is to help communicate the strength of the password, then the criteria should absolutely be shown. A meter by itself isn't enough to communicate "this is both long and complex enough, based on the criteria we've established for our site." Password strength meters (and strength criteria, for that matter) are unstandardized and vary widely among sites, so the user will need clear help from your system. A progress indicator is not necessary, especially if the criteria are shown. But they might help nudge the user to keep adding characters and try a little harder to make their password more secure. One of the clearest indication patterns of a user's progress is by showing the criteria as a list, and displaying indicators in real time when each condition is met. (Case sensitivity and avoiding reuse would not be validated here, and would be listed elsewhere.)

Put your properties down. Password type string https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/a65txexh.aspx and properties IsPasswordSet type bool (initial value) false) You'll have to put it in user scope, not in application scope!Now you can use a code like this:if (!Properties.Settings.Default.IsPasswordSet) { Console.WriteLine("Set password: "); Properties.Settings.Default.Password = Console.ReadLine(); Properties.Settings.Default.IsPasswordSet = true; Properties.Settings.Default.Save(); } else { Console.WriteLine("Enter password: "); var password = Console.ReadLine(); if (password != Properties.Settings.Default.Password) Environment.Exit(1); } This decision, however, keeps the password open. If you want something more reliable, count it.You can reinforce the password protection if you encrypt your configuration as specified https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms254494.aspx#Anchor_2 ♪However, decisions where password testing is carried out on a user-controlled system, fundamentally unsafe♪ An ill-intended user can replace the data where you store the password to your own. Well, any program that operates under the control of the user can be hacked. That's why. Don't use it. This decision, if the power of password protection depends on security or access to important information.

For this task, there is an attribute autocomplete♪In order to prohibit, use:autocomplete="off"

As far as I'm concerned, you'll be able to add an attribute. autocomplete="off" to these fields. Details of this function: http://htmlbook.ru/html/input/autocomplete

It's the right thing to think that the token keeps what it is.But keeping the hush password in the cuisine is worse.Having access thinners is worth a lot, and there's a way to do it, for example. https://github.com/lynndylanhurley/devise_token_auth/blob/master/app/models/devise_token_auth/concerns/user.rb#L10 ♪ Although it seems to be a few. paranoid, especially the change of the token to every request.But it doesn't cause a catastrophic slowdown. How? Cash. Instead of permanent recalculation bcrypt-hash The system holds the same tokens in operational memory Cash of the last 10000 tokens treated.Can we get into this cash? Theoretically... ♪ Yeah.If you know where to look (and if there's access to the server, you'll have to guess for a while). GDB can be submerged in a working Ruby-process and with a reflexia full of Ruby to reach the target.But if there's a hole on the server that allows it to be done, you've got a bigger problem.

There is an attribute to disable the vehicle. autocomplete="off" (See. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms533486(VS.85).aspx )However, many browsers don't support it for type password (See. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3868299/is-autocomplete-off-compatible-with-all-modern-browsers/21348793#21348793 ) Try to set this attribute for login.

I'd do:different sessions should be held for each page, for example:Page http://sitename/users - $_SESSION['users_login'];Page http://sitename/news - $_SESSION['news_login'];When a laser goes on the page, you have to check if he's already bailed out;If not collateraled, redirect the login to the page with any parameter (name of page, e.g. users)When the user introduces login/couple, checked according to page (get parameter)If these correctly record the necessary records in the session and revert to the previous page (get parameter), if the data are not correct, make a mistake

No local app. If you really need protection, make a client-serious application.

It's not logical that the first fallen person who knows my e-mail has ordered a retrieval of the password, and I have a password change... Made:curl -d 'email=мой@e-mail&ok=1' http://url.где.этотскрипт We'll put it in ten minutes and order, I've got a lot of shit.Substantial: The link to the database is transferred after verification to an empty e-mailUPDATE:curl is a command-line utilite with a lipstick that can be staggered/downloaded/uploaded, and many more useful or harmful actions.Well, protection - we're setting up another table where she reclaims her species:id, timestamp, login When requested, we record (update) the entry in this table, as id writes some md5, timestamp = now(), login and e-mail, respectively, send a letter to e-mail referring to the recovery page containing id.This page checks the availability of id in the table and, if any, changes the password or asks the user what password is to be inserted and removed from the password recovery table.About that.

In the installation of MySQL from ubuntu packages, there is also a system user debian-sys-maint, if you did not remove the user, it is possible to see the password in the /etc/mysql/debian.cnf. File is only available for reading from the super-user. Using this user, the MySQL password can be reassigned to the original user using a team.SET PASSWORD FOR 'root'@'localhost' = PASSWORD('пароль');

We need to load up. single mode, for this, let the system in the rebutt, at the time of the kernel selection of the os. GRUB) Press the " E " button, after which a window will be opened in which the loading parameters will be written, you need to finish the line with the parameters. single or s♪ After editing, we press Enter and then the "b" button for loading.After loading, thermal will be open, we'll start a team. passwd root Next, we'll get a new password for the roll. We're overloading, we're all set.

All six encryption algorithms on which the function is based crypt() (i.e. DES, Extended DES, MD5, Blowfish, SHA256 and SHA512) are irreversible, so it is not possible to obtain from the encrypted line a reference method other than the bulkhead. The MD5 and DES use relatively short keys, so the bulkhead may result in reasonable time. The rest of the algorithms are inappropriate to break the bulkhead at the current computing capacity. If you don't know the NSAs who can tell what kind of mortgages are in the listed algorithms, the best advice will be put. If you still want to break the recipe, you should think about launching a distributed bulkhead on several machines (botnet?) and not in the PHP interpreter, but on CUDA and similar technologies.

Do not use the violin via the web, but from the command line, there will be no time limit.

Everyone just gets access to the cloud, the cloud has a password manaster with BDE passwords and voila.P.S. I've done everything, and I've already done it, when I've had to re-establish everything in a distant island on the Internet café. Dropbox - forever :

The data stored on the user side should encrypt the key stored on the server.This is an example. Node. JS and for PHP: http://habrahabr.ru/company/nordavind/blog/196018/ and http://toster.ru/q/59290