.NET is comprised of two primary components: the runtime, and the framework. The runtime is the part of .NET that manages runtime execution of .NET processes, and it includes things like the JIT. The framework is the set of class libraries that are utilised in the .NET environment, providing namespaces like System.Text or System.Security.Cryptography. After .NET Framework 4.x, Microsoft started a new project named .NET Core. This was a breaking change for the ecosystem, removing a lot of legacy APIs and features, so it was forked off as its own thing. Core is cross-platform and largely open source. Three major releases were made (ending in .NET Core 3.x) before Microsoft made the Core project their canonical release as .NET 5. This continues to today, with .NET 6. ".NET Framework" (note the capital F) refers to versions 4.x and prior of the .NET class libraries. These are the old, pre-core frameworks. They run on the old .NET Runtime. ".NET Runtime" (note the capital R) usually refers to the common language runtime (CLR) that runs applications built on the .NET Framework. The new framework, introduced with Core, is usually referred to as CoreFX or Core Framework. These are the .NET Core equivalent of the .NET Framework standard libraries. The new runtime is called Core CLR. There is also a standardised subset of APIs that are common to both .NET Framework and .NET Core. This is referred to as .NET Standard. What Microsoft means by this: Vulnerabilities in the .NET Framework, or any ASP.NET framework running on .NET Framework (Webforms or MVC). is that vulnerabilities in the .NET Framework, and their ASP.NET counterparts, i.e. the frameworks prior to Core, are not in scope because they are now either legacy products or "old branch" products that they don't cover in bug bounties. Note that they do not exclude the .NET Runtime, since that remains of high relevance for security even though CoreCLR is their focus for the future.

You cannot lock down any user from anything on its own device. User can patch the application to sidestep the checks, can patch Windows APIs to return whatever he wants, can create an user with all privileges he wanted. The game industry is trying really hard to implement client-side protection, some use kernel drivers, even employ rootkits, but cheaters still are able to bypass protections and misuse the game client. So it's useless to try? No, it's not. You can raise the bar, so the effort to bypass the protections are higher than the payout from doing so. If the user have low incentive to break your program, they won't bother. On the other hand, if the payout is larger than the effort, they will find a way to break it.

This answer complements the comments on the original question. What do these claims mean anyway? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#section-4.1.1 : The iss-claim corresponds to the authority who issued the token. In federated identity environments this grants information about who signed the token; and subsequently where the validating party should validate the signature; For instance, the issuer claim of a token issued by Azure AD typically looks somewhat like this: https://sts.windows.net/{TENANT}. In a scenario with multiple possible identity providers this information is crucial to tell them apart and determine towards where the resource owner has authenticated himself to access the resource. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#section-4.1.3 : The audience is the intended recipient of the token. This information is required to ensure a token issued to access some-resource.com is not accepted as valid when offered to some-other-resource.com. Do we need them in the specified scenario? In theory, yes; in practice, probably not. As long as tokens are signed and you possess exclusive knowledge about your signing key, including these claims offers little to no benefit (to reiterate: only as long you serve but a single audience). What would this look like in ASP.NET? When sticking to the libraries and extensions offered by Microsoft, configuring the setting and validation of these claims is a matter of just a few lines: Setting the claims: new SecurityTokenDescriptor { Issuer = "https://my-resource.com", Audience = "https://my-resource.com", /*...*/ }; Validating them: new TokenValidationParameters { ValidateIssuer = true, ValidIssuer = "https://my-resource.com", ValidateAudience = true, ValidAudience = "https://my-resource.com", /*...*/ }; Note that this checks for the string value only, for calling the token validation endpoints of third party providers further configuration of the authentication middleware is required. Comment on the mentioned tutorials Every tutorial and reference implementation seems to specify them, even for a simple use case like mine. I made this observation too and am rather surprised that these samples gain so much traction. A lot of them seem to forget the main point of asymmetric encryption of issued tokens is to circumvent the issue of storing and providing secrets amongst multiple partially untrusted parties, which is not the case in the given scenario. My advice: go for JWK and symmetrically encrypt your tokens, ideally on top of signing. Third parties won't have a about the user specific claim you issue and can't make assumptions about your API from the intel given in your token (though your security naturally shouldn't rely on that).

Yes, it is important to fix vulnerabilities inside a corporate environment, even if these hosts are not internet-facing. Why? Because if the endpoint is used by an employee, it can be compromised via phishing, malware, breached VPN access or similar means. This means your idea of a "safe environment" doesn't hold up to reality. If your security is based on the fact that you don't expect an attacker to be able to access the application, then one compromised host can lead to compromise of many or all hosts running the vulnerable application. This leads to the next point, which is Lateral Movement. Lateral Movement is the process of an attacker compromising other hosts with similar privileges, in order to maintain their access and get access to more information. For example, having access to every employee endpoint could enable an attacker to perform more sophisticated attacks, such as stealing tokens from the local system administrator, or finding credentials inside a maintainance script for the Domain Controller. As a final step, an attacker can then use the gathered information to attack high-value targets, such as Domain Controllers, Database Servers, etc... To Summarize: While the vulnerable native application was not the first step in this hypothetical attacker's path, it was instrumental to giving the attacker access to a wide variety of hosts, which in turn contained a high amount of usable information. As a result, it is highly advisable to remediate vulnerabilities in native applications, even if they are only run inside a corprorate environment.

Encrypting the complete file or encrypting only the entry will provide the same level of security regarding this entry. There is no practical difference, they offer the same protection against the same threat. Side note: Please note however that if an end user can reverse-engineer your application or read its memory, this user can discover the encryption key and recover the encrypted password. So, while encrypting can provide some amount of security against common users, it is not enough to resist a motivated attacker with an access to the running application. But maybe those attackers do not exist in your threat model, but then in this case maybe encrypting this entry is pointless and proper access control would be enough. Only you can answer those questions.

It's a syntaxis of a fresh C# 6.0. public UserGroup[] Groups Square announcement and after operator => His ghetter. I mean, now the lambda can determine the properties and methods. And in the next version, the designer will be available.Equivalent in the old versionpublic UserGroup[] Groups { get { return (from _ in this.UserGroups select new UserGroup { Display=_.DisplayName, Value=_.Id.ToString() } ).ToArray<UserGroup>(); } }

Yes, I can. COM technology does not require any registration in the registry for its use!All the steps listed on the issue are needed to reduce the interlinkages of the modules. If you don't take these steps, you don't need them or you just lean on them, you can miss them.Here's the worker. minimum an example.C#using System; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; [ComVisible(true), InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsIUnknown)] interface ICallback { void execute(); } class Program : ICallback { static void Main(string[] args) { SetCallbacks(new Program()); } [DllImport("mylib", CallingConvention=CallingConvention.StdCall)] static extern void SetCallbacks(ICallback callback); void ICallback.execute() { Console.WriteLine("Hello, world!"); } } C+++#include "windows.h" interface ICallback : IUnknown { virtual HRESULT __stdcall execute() = 0; }; extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void __stdcall SetCallbacks(ICallback *cb) { cb->execute(); } In the example above, the two-language versions were produced independently. In principle, this is a double job, so it makes sense to draw an interface only once, after which it should be imported.If the interface is in the C++-project in the IDL language, it is sufficient that the model library in the C#-project be connected as dependence. It doesn't have to be registered.If the interface is in the C#-project, it must be inserted in addition to the above attributes. https://msdn.microsoft.com/ru-ru/library/system.runtime.interopservices.guidattribute(v=vs.110).aspx and make it public. The type library can then be removed through tlbexp and connected to C+-project. No registration is required for the type library on the roster.

In method Configure Class Startup added app.Map("/products",a => a.UseRequest());

We can use it. Microsoft.CSharp.CSharpCodeProvider.GetTypeOutputvar compiler = new CSharpCodeProvider(); var type = new CodeTypeReference(typeof(int)); Console.WriteLine(typeof(int).Name); Console.WriteLine(compiler.GetTypeOutput(type)); Output:Int32 int

https://msdn.microsoft.com/ru-ru/library/system.applicationid.publickeytoken(v=vs.110).aspx provided that the collection file itself is exactly the same on different computers and is signed by the same open key.P.S. Is it crucial to download the collection on her long name?

Uh, c+ is a good thing, but it's making the documentation go bad.Turns out it's about incubation, pDefaultAppDomain->Load_2 Requesting entry BSTRwhich is incapsulated WCHAR (no computing errors):typedef WCHAR OLECHAR; typedef OLECHAR* BSTR; typedef BSTR* LPBSTR; But he's not. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms221069(v=vs.85).aspx :The following code is incorrect: BSTR MyBstr = L"I am a happy BSTR";This code builds (compiles and links) correctly, but it will not function properly because the string does not have a length prefix. If you use a debugger to examine the memory location of this variable, you will not see a four-byte length prefix preceding the data string.It's right to write: BSTR MyBstr = SysAllocString(L"I am a happy BSTR");

You can use either. https://www.postsharp.net/ or to do so independently through management http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/8436/Intercepting-method-calls-in-C-an-approach-to-AOSD &quot; .

Marshalling is a transfer from one context to another. Serialization is a recording of the sequence of elements.Marshalling is a higher-level process than a show. Usually, if you have to transfer the data structure from one process to another, it's scrambled, passed and desserized. If the parameter is two-way, it'll have to be transmitted twice, and it will. One Marshaling surgery.Or it is possible to transmit by reference when a proxy object is created on the other side of the channel, and the channel is transmitted not to the inner condition of the facility but to the challenges of its methods.In the case of a relationship between a manageable and unmanageable code, marshalling is the fixing of objects &apos; addresses or the copying of structures between a controlled and unregulated memory, seriesing is not used at all.

Print search (Thumbprint):var thumbprint = Regex.Replace("‎d2 46 8d 22 87 ab b7 00 35 e7 e1 cf d9 8f 6c 3d a7 cf c3 42", @"[^\da-zA-z]", string.Empty).ToUpper(); using (var store = new X509Store(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser)) { store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadOnly); var certificates = store.Certificates.Find(X509FindType.FindByThumbprint, thumbprint, false); if (certificates.Count &gt; 0) { var certificate = certificates[0]; Console.WriteLine($"Субъект: {certificate.Subject}"); }; }

We need to add the background of the cell:e.PaintBackground(e.ClipBounds, true); There is no need to process the event. Scroll♪The code can be simplified a little using other properties/methods.It is also desirable to release all the resources used in the code.I'd write one way:if (e.RowIndex == -1 && e.ColumnIndex != -1) { e.PaintBackground(e.ClipBounds, true); var headerArea = new Rectangle(e.CellBounds.X, e.CellBounds.Y, 16, 16); var contentArea = new Rectangle(e.CellBounds.X + 16, e.CellBounds.Y, e.CellBounds.Width - 16, e.CellBounds.Height); using (var fillbrush = new SolidBrush(Color.Red)) using (var formatName = new StringFormat()) using (var fontBrush = new SolidBrush(dataGridView1.ColumnHeadersDefaultCellStyle.ForeColor)) { e.Graphics.FillRectangle(fillbrush, headerArea); formatName.Alignment = StringAlignment.Center; formatName.LineAlignment = StringAlignment.Center; e.Graphics.DrawString(e.Value.ToString(), dataGridView1.ColumnHeadersDefaultCellStyle.Font, fontBrush, contentArea, formatName); } e.Handled = true; } I will also note that, starting with NET 2.0, the default GDI is used in WinForms to paint the text. I mean, you should use it. TextRenderer.DrawText instead of GDI+ Graphics.DrawString♪ Their conclusion is very small, but different.

The problem is, obviously, that you have the names of the log files based on the date template. The format of the date shall be such that the limitation on the number of log files will only be within 1 second. Simply put, the logs will be cleaned themselves only if their number exceeds 3 files per second and disposed of exactly the ones that were recorded first this second. Look. http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.13/release/sdk/log4net.Appender.RollingFileAppender.MaxSizeRollBackups.html : The maximum applies to each time based group of files and not the total. Possible solution (at the patch level) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-27 I didn't. I'd recommend experimenting with this and try to change the file's name pattern, for example, 1 day. Thus, if more than 3 files are recorded in the course of the day, there must be a grip.

I think it's not possible with these conditions, since the autogeneration uses a list of characteristics of a particular type for the construction of a column.Possible solutions: ! Edited* To change the type of object collection, as the test showed, it will give the result you wanted.Use of another WM with ObservableCollection<MyClassEx> Itemsbut I don't think this option is considered because there are many different heirs, and you won't do it for each of your VMs. Clear definition of columns and bindings in xaml (which contradicts the condition of the autogeneration of columns) (as already suggested in the comments) Implement its DataGrid with a modified pole generation mechanism. (but it's more like a warrior, not an option )PS No repair for comment)

Cystem.Linq.Expressions may be used:var p1 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(ExampleClass)); var p2 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int)); var body = Expression.Assign(Expression.Property(p1, "IntProp"), p2); var setter = Expression.Lambda<Action<ExampleClass, int>>(body, p1, p2).Compile(); for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) setter(ec, i);

Turns out, SuspendLayout does not block the rewriting of the control elements, only suspends the logic of the maquet (which is useful in TableLayoutPanel, FlowLayoutPanel and the use of Anchor, Dock etc.).Addressing the problem https://stackoverflow.com/questions/778095/windows-forms-using-backgroundimage-slows-down-drawing-of-the-forms-controls :public static class ControlHelper { [DllImport("user32.dll", EntryPoint = "SendMessageA", ExactSpelling = true, CharSet = CharSet.Ansi, SetLastError = true)] private static extern int SendMessage(IntPtr hwnd, int wMsg, int wParam, int lParam); private const int WM_SETREDRAW = 0xB; public static void SuspendDrawing(this Control target) { SendMessage(target.Handle, WM_SETREDRAW, 0, 0); } public static void ResumeDrawing(this Control target) { ResumeDrawing(target, true); } public static void ResumeDrawing(this Control target, bool redraw) { SendMessage(target.Handle, WM_SETREDRAW, 1, 0); if (redraw) { target.Refresh(); } } }

Is the type inherited from MarshalByRefObject? Types inherited from this class can be used: in one house, we create a copy, in another house, we're doing this copy. Houses can be on different cars. It's called technology.NET Remoting.