Example of file .git/hooks/pre-commitwhich is just copying new/modified (possibly others - see. https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-diff.html for optical values --diff-filter() Catalogue files dir1 Catalogue dir2 (and adds them to the inside)#!/bin/sh from=dir1 to=dir2 mkdir -p $to for f in $(git diff --cached --name-only --diff-filter=AM | grep "^$from/"); do n=$(echo $f | sed "s.^$from.$to.") cp $f $n git add $n done exit 0 Rather than copying, of course, more useful actions can be done.The way the files are selected is considered in this response: https://stackoverflow.com/a/3068990/4827341

The following team has decided:git log //показывает список всех коммитов в текущей бранче и их id git revert <id> //отменяет изменения выбранного коммита локально. Next. commit♪ push♪

git reset --hard HEAD~1 Remove the ends, apply to some very large packs. Judging by history, it's about 1 commite.git checkout 53d1bb31b554d1422661e4f4a71f77582e33fea4 It's just a soft move to this comemite.

Yeah, that's what it takes. https://git-scm.com/book/ru/v1/%D0%98%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%8B-Git-%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%8C-%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8#%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0 ♪Example of useLet's see the commite history.$ git log commit 5c4a8e76f951eb7ee157f4136257f6666fddf1d1 Author: John Doe <johndoe@gmail.com> Date: Sun Aug 28 14:40:30 2016 +0300 Changed 1.txt commit 7f2ad8c26ad032800c049d0d6122c43410a5cbbc Author: John Doe <johndoe@gmail.com> Date: Sun Aug 28 14:39:30 2016 +0300 Initial commit Let's say there's a file that needs to be added to the previous room.$ git status On branch master Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) test.txt Add this file to the index by team. git add♪$ git add --all $ git status On branch master Changes to be committed: (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage) new file: test.txt After that, you can add the file to the last comedian by Use --amend team git commit♪ You may also change the committee's message. -m 'Commit message'♪ ♪ Leave a message to the committus the same way, just hand over the empty line. For the communication -m ''♪$ git commit -m 'Added test' --amend [master aad3e76] Added test Date: Sun Aug 28 14:40:30 2016 +0300 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 test.txt Let's check the commite history.$ git log --stat commit aad3e7653cd76c4afa1a9272bd421493b4e3055c Author: John Doe <johndoe@gmail.com> Date: Sun Aug 28 14:40:30 2016 +0300 Added test 1.txt | 3 ++- test.txt | 0 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) commit 7f2ad8c26ad032800c049d0d6122c43410a5cbbc Author: John Doe <johndoe@gmail.com> Date: Sun Aug 28 14:39:30 2016 +0300 Initial commit 1.txt | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Other ways to change historyIn order to change the history of the commites, such teams as git rebase and git filter-branchbut they are used in much more complex cases. For example, if you want to change the comedian that was made a few comets ago, you can use the interactive. rebase ♪ git rebase -i♪Details on the change of history in git can be read https://git-scm.com/book/ru/v1/%D0%98%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%8B-Git-%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%8C-%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8 ♪ P. S. Be careful.using this reception because git commit --amend In fact, it creates a new commit, which includes changes from the commite that you change + added changes. Don't rule the last comedian if you've already sent him to a remote repository.

Are you wearing a remote repository after that?If so, it is not possible to do so directly, but it is possible to remove manually from the repository the files added by mistake and added to the guidor, and they will not be there anymore.After clarification: You can try. https://git-scm.com/docs/git-rebase To create a new story from a comme with the right guitar.

GitHub makes it easy to make forks of other people's repositories. Do a copy of the library to yourself and use it as a submodule.

If you only need to fill uncompleted data, but another branch, you can do that. First we give the team. git stash♪ She'll get a different change, keep him in a special carman and remove them from the branch. Now you can easily switch to another branch - git checkout feature/addfriendsblock♪ We're doing a new branch. git stash apply - Now with the Carman, there will be changes and applied in a new place (if they stay in their pocket). It's possible that there will be conflicts, that they will have to be resolved. After that, the code can be checked and committed.

And now I want to scare her into a local branch developYou can't scare one local branch into another. Only a remote server can intimidate. And you probably want to swap two branches together. It's called merge. I don't know what to do with this idea, I do it, and I strongly recommend it, in consoles. It's just there.git checkout develop # перешли в develop git merge featureRefactorCameraHelper # слили featureRefactorCameraHelper -> origin:+featureRefactorCameraHelperIt's not a tricky environment that shows that your branch featureRefactorCameraHelper I'll be sent to the pseudonym server. origin (is a default name for a remote server). And the plus one means that this branch will be created if it's not there.

If you understand the question correctly, you have doubts about the merger of the branches and their interaction. But your thoughts are in the right direction. In the simplest case, it looks like: локальные ветки - master (релиз), develop... удаленные ветки (на сервере) - master (релиз), develop... But no one forbids you to make more winds, the better the tone counts for any record (or a new function, or a release) to make a separate branch and to check its capacity in it.All changes, new figs, the tags should be made through the branch develop, as the master is considered stable in any comme. The master branch only sends ready-to-date releases, you know, or flash drives.Wind merger on the server is bad tone, as conflicts may arise. Conflicts must be addressed in local repositories.It looks like a simple job. You're adjusting the branch to develop (for example, adding a new function, which is certain) to merge it with the master &apos; s main branch (create a release) and to send it to the test server (site test version) for verification. On the test server, you're pulling changes and checking if you're capable of working, you can send a master and a main server.

git revert -n 1234567 // плохой коммит git commit path/to/file -m 'reverted blahblah' // файл который нужно ревертнуть git reset --hard Head // остальное нам не надо The point is:1. Repeat a bad comedian, but we will not be able to change the reverse.2. Commemorate canceling changes in the required files3. Dismiss everything (i.e. files that don't want to change) to the final committee (para. 2).I do that, in any gui, it's a couple of clicks. There may be more sophisticated ways.

If the necessary comedian is stunned between the others, we'll start rebase:$ git rebase -i HEAD~3 pick Add simple benchmarks pick Fix #42: Notifications in IE pick Update docs And we just remove the unnecessary line (for our example, we take the top):+ pick Fix #132: one more try pick Update docs Source: http://tonyganch.com/git/rebase/

You know, before you're big, git commit and beating. git push The change must be on the old computer. git pull The repository changesitory to itself, now the content of the remote and local repository(s)atters.This option would, by the way, be appropriate if there was a situation that, at some point, the old computer had simply stopped making changes and all work was done with another computer.

Teg's just a name comedian. If you need to support some of the leads, make the branches. E., in your case, make a branch that starts from the current 1.0 there and make the right for this version.UpdatingT.G. is just a committ's name, you're not gonna change it. And what branch to come and how to organize is to decide. That's, for example, the beginning of a list of branches. scrapy: remotes/origin/0.12 remotes/origin/0.14 remotes/origin/0.16 remotes/origin/0.18 remotes/origin/0.20 remotes/origin/0.22 remotes/origin/0.24 remotes/origin/1.0 remotes/origin/1.1 remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master They're in their branch every version.

Because it's two separate unrelated stories to connect them, you have to. merger♪ It's confusing that branches in different repositories and how to do mergers are unclear. ♪ ♪ https://ru.stackoverflow.com/q/262794/181100 but not exactly like the reference. One repository can be pulled into another.Just do it. pull It's not worth another repository, because in this case, the original files of one repository will fall into the root of another, and the purpose is slightly different. So instead pull Do what it consists of: fetch+merge♪♪ Main.repgit remote add checker путь/к/Checker.rep # указать источник git fetch checker # только скачать (!) коммиты # warning: no common commits # <- ну, это ожидаемо # remote: Counting objects: 5, done. # remote: Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. # remote: Total 5 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0) # Unpacking objects: 100% (5/5), done. # From путь/к/Checker.rep # * [new branch] master -> checker/master git merge checker/master --no-commit Flag interests --no-commit (laughs) pullwhich after completion of the merger procedure stop Gitto correct the results. It's time to put the merger files in the right file:git mv *Ch.file Checker.folder That's all, the desired state has been achieved.git commit Ready.

Then turn out of the next comme.Detailed information on the issue https://ru.stackoverflow.com/q/431520/181472 ♪ Shortly, when you fix it, you can just move into the right comedian or even create a new branch.Remove the changes from the project,That'll be the whole answer.The most important question is:Have you managed to intimidate this branch on a remote repository? Is it possible that another developer has already received a remote repository of comemite B or one of the following, and continues to work on it. If the answer is yes, in general, it is desirable. revertbut not rebase, cherry-pick, and other things that rewrite Git's story, as it creates https://ru.stackoverflow.com/q/429512/181472 ♪ Since you need to move out of C that does not contain changes from B, it's almost certainly necessary to write a story. In that case, alert the colleagues in advance. They're going to have to rebate their changes in the same way, for example, with the commite. D ♪ D'♪We'll set the initial situation on the following pattern:A - B - C - D ↑ branchname (HEAD) A♪ B♪ C♪ D - the switches in the branch. branchname♪ B - The bad comedian, we need to remove it. Commmit C We need to lock up. (HEAD) - The location of the HEAD indicator.↑ Describes the committee to which a certain branch or index indicates.Option 1 - through rebase -iPlus, less trash in history. And you can be proud to learn rebase.Plus, it is possible to move from C that does not contain changes from B.Minus is rewriting history, dangerous in command.Teams:git checkout branchname git rebase -i A git checkout -b deployme C' As A, we point a comemite right before we rule out. A's still in place. The editor's gonna open up, he'll have the commites back. Change pick ♪ dropthat we want to throw that comedian out.drop 323d4e6 comment for B pick 31da2b9 comment for C pick 24d420c comment for D Rebase c8893f9..24d420c onto c8893f9 (3 command(s)) Commands: p, pick = use commit r, reword = use commit, but edit the commit message e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending s, squash = use commit, but meld into previous commit f, fixup = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message x, exec = run command (the rest of the line) using shell d, drop = remove commit OutcomeA - C' - D' ↑ branchname (HEAD) ↑ deployme (HEAD) New committs now have another ancestor, so it's other, new commites (although the contents are the same less B). New branch deployme looking at the comedian. C'♪Option 2 - through revertPlus, he doesn't rewrite history, and he's safe with teamwork. More than rebase.Minus is the wrong comedian staying in history. It's bad if there's information that you can't show or a code that's embarrassed to publish. :Minus - Committ C continue to contain changes from B♪Teams:git checkout branchname git revert B Result:A - B - C - D - xB ↑ branchname (HEAD) New comedy. xB contains changes that eliminate changes in the text. B♪ But we have a problem: C still contains changes from B♪A little more detailed revert: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-revert https://ru.stackoverflow.com/a/431521/181472 ♪In addition:If there's a mistake in the process or you lose the wrong comedy: https://ru.stackoverflow.com/q/232455/181472 But if you want, you can do something with other comedians: https://ru.stackoverflow.com/q/416761/181472 ♪

Linux / OS XWe' remote repositories, indicating the name of the record.curl -u 'USER_NAME' https://api.github.com/user/repos -d'{"name":"demo"}' Introduce the password from the records:Enter host password for user 'USER_NAME':Repository demo created. Now we're downloading the project.git remote add origin https://github.com/USER_NAME/demo.git git push -u origin master WindowsOption 1:Setting up the toilet. http://www.confusedbycode.com/curl/ and reload. Next, the sequence is identical to Linux.Option 2 (Thanks https://ru.stackoverflow.com/users/194908/pinktux Downloading the archives. https://sourceforge.net/projects/tumagcc/files/ , archivate any place on the disk and describe the path to the variable. PATH♪ Open the command line and write the following:wget https://api.github.com/user/repos --user=%USER_NAME --password=%PASSWORD --auth-no-challenge --post-data="{\"name\":\"demo\"}" Pay attention to the screen of the carbs. (Pretty slash in front of the pot) Total --post-data♪ While there is no need for rebooting, there is also a lack of sufficient means. it's clear that the password is in the line♪In this way, repositories can be created with different parameters. There's a full tone. https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/#create ♪ For example, privatized repository (if you have such a privilegeYou need to put it in line one after -d:'{"name":"demo", "private":"true"}' https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2423777/is-it-possible-to-create-a-remote-repo-on-github-from-the-cli-without-ssh/10325316#10325316

Add. *.suo Total .gitignore♪Files .suo contains the status of open panels Visual Studio and all such things that are interesting only in a local car. They don't belong in the repository.Here's a big list of what should be at the .gitignore for projects under Visual Studio: https://www.gitignore.io/api/visualstudio

The commit code can be corrected by:$ git filter-branch -f --commit-filter ' author_type=$( echo $GIT_AUTHOR_NAME | file -b --mime-encoding - ) author=$( echo $GIT_AUTHOR_NAME | iconv -f $author_type -t UTF-8 ) GIT_AUTHOR_NAME=$author committer_type=$( echo $GIT_COMMITTER_NAME | file -b --mime-encoding - ) committer=$( echo $GIT_COMMITTER_NAME | iconv -f $committer_type -t UTF-8 ) GIT_COMMITTER_NAME=$committer git commit-tree "$@";' --msg-filter ' cat > .commitmsg type=$(cat .commitmsg|file -b --mime-encoding -) cat .commitmsg|iconv -f $type -t UTF-8 ' HEAD $ rm -f .commitmsg I also recommend that we review. http://git-scm.com/docs/git-commit ♪ Some of the details of the guitar coding work are described near the end.

You can take off the whole comedian, but only certain paths are where your files are damaged. It will help to keep up with the changes you made on your own.git reset --hard HEAD^ -- /path1 /path2 somefile

It's best to completely remove the repositories. Then I'll just take what I need.There have been cases where a guy accidentally intimidated his guitar with his keys and his hacks... ♪ ♪and the comets cannot be removed, the same version control system, the history of change is its primary responsibility.