The Freamworth itself is made by ACL, reading about it. https://laravel.com/docs/5.3/authorization Now, RBAC, it's just a component, I'd advise: https://packagist.org/packages/dcn/rbac I also wrote my RBAC for Laravel 5.3 but didn't readme, you can identify and ask if there are questions: https://packagist.org/packages/yaroslavmolchan/rbac

We're "solim" login password, and we're keeping chesh-funk in the database.Don't do that. Even the core. http://php.net/manual/en/ref.password.php specially for password processing.And you don't have to do anything about that hush anymore. You need some kind of token for something? Got it. http://php.net/manual/en/book.csprng.php (and the php is not an excuse, there is a reference in the manuale to use in the user ' s space).We're in the database, that's the cuke's meaning. It won't leave the bottom base in a day. Since the user of the time of life of a cuisine cannot be trusted, you need to keep his life around the token.Accordingly, with the authorisation, you're the token generator. Because the thing is important to safety, it's only through CSPRNGa cryptic generator. No. rand♪ mt_rand or shuffle♪ You keep the token in some storage facility on the server. I can call two options:write to the Token User ' s plate and the date of the Token. Then check the token and the date, was it too long?write a separate plate: user_id♪ token♪ valid_until♪ Can I have another one? ip♪ user agent And it's beautiful to show the laser, "there's been a few weeks since you've been copying it right there." For each authorization, they received their token and their time of life and, if necessary, they could be shot selectively.(Table is model. It can be stored anywhere, not just in the RSBD.Don't forget when you change the password to drop all the tokens. And don't forget to set the optical parameters for the dock, httponly Right, secure - if you're caught up in the building. https♪You can still keep the user_id in the cuisine. The publication of the id in itself does not, and often they are, publicly accessible, for example in the url section on the site, but it is easier to find.

The error arises from the function wp_set_auth_cookie()She's working with the headlines. Try using it instead. wp_signon() or wp_authenticate():wp_signon(array( 'user_login' => $current_user->user_login, 'user_password' => $user_data['new_password'], 'remember' => true, // или false, если не нужно запоминать пользователя )); orwp_authenticate($current_user->user_login, $user_data['new_password']);

<?php /** * Програмный логин пользователя * * @param string $username * @return bool */ function mihdan_programmatic_login( $username ) { if ( is_user_logged_in() ) { wp_logout(); } add_filter( 'authenticate', 'allow_programmatic_login', 10, 3 ); $user = wp_signon( array( 'user_login' => $username ) ); remove_filter( 'authenticate', 'allow_programmatic_login', 10, 3 ); if ( is_a( $user, 'WP_User' ) ) { wp_set_current_user( $user->ID, $user->user_login ); if ( is_user_logged_in() ) { return true; } } return false; } /** * Патчим коллбэк фильтра 'authenticate', позволяя входить, * указываяя только username * * @param WP_User $user * @param string $username * @param string $password * @return bool|WP_User */ function allow_programmatic_login( $user, $username, $password ) { return get_user_by( 'login', $username ); } Use a very simple, sufficient place to call a function. mihdan_programmatic_loginby giving her an argument. username:mihdan_programmatic_login('mihdan');

I've asked the same question, but for Angular 2 of the annex, which exists on some house mydomain.com.As I can imagine, the annex should seek permission to service (alas Facebook), Facebook will redesign to the page maydomain.com/facebook, the Annex receives from Facebook the code and crosses its backbone, and the Bakend already agrees with Facebook and gets access to it. Acess_token refers to api and receives information about id, email, user_name, generates from id foto_url. Creates the user profile, and further requests to the Beckenda, he should already check access. Maybe I'm wrong, but I haven't found the exact information yet.If you've already found a working solution, you'll have to inform the pelvis!

The meaning of the title "referer" (when asked for form) should be put in a hidden field of shape, for example. If the value has not been detected, it will revert to the default page.public class AutorizedOnly : AuthorizeAttribute { public override void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationContext filterContext) { base.OnAuthorization(filterContext); if (/*is NOT autorized*/) { Uri returnTo = filterContext.HttpContext.Request.UrlReferrer; filterContext.Result = RedirectToAction("Login", "Accounting", new { returnUrl = returnTo }); } } } public class Accounting : Controller { ... [HttpGet] public IActionResul Login(Uri returnTo) { ViewBag.returnTo = returnTo.ToString(); return View(); } [HttpPost] public IActionResul Login(string returnTo, SignInModel model) { if (ModelState.IsValid) { if (/login success/) { /* Set cookie with session id */ return Redirect(returnTo); } } ... } ... }

The next code will remove the user's name and all the groups in which it is made. Dim dirr As DirectoryEntry = New DirectoryEntry("WinNT://TEST-SERVER") Dim User As DirectoryEntry = dirr.Children.Find(userName, "User") Dim obGroups As Object = User.Invoke("Groups") Response.Write(userName + ":") For Each obG In obGroups Dim obGpEntry As DirectoryEntry = New DirectoryEntry(obG) Response.Write(obGpEntry.Name & "; ") Next

Helped it:<? if (!$USER->IsAuthorized()) { CJSCore::Init(array('ajax', 'json', 'ls', 'session', 'jquery', 'popup','pull')); } ?> Add header.php after <?$APPLICATION->ShowHead()?>

♪ app.post('/login') received body login + password, check database data, if OK, then make a session for the user, or send a mistake.let u = ... // полученные данных из модели по login + password if (!u) return next(new Error('BAD_USERPASS')); req.session.user = u; res.status(200).send(u.name); // middlewares/user.js exports.user = function(req, res, next) { req.user = res.locals.user = null; // Check session if (!req.session || !req.session.user || !req.session.user.id) return next(); var u = ... // Данные из модели, напр по req.session.user.id; req.user = res.locals.user = (!!u &amp;&amp; !!u.id) ? u : null; next(); // После выполнения в req.locals.user будут данные о пользователе } app.use('middlewares/user'); // middlewares/auth.js exports.auth = function(req, res, next) { // Проверяем, что пользователь задан или имеет доступ. return next(new Error((req.user) ? 403 : 401)); } // Если надо проверять не все роуты var auth = require('middlewares/auth'); app.get('/smth-path', auth, function(req, res, next) { ...render...}); // Если надо проверять все роуты app.use('middlewares/auth');

Add to the mass user key authTimeout and clean up. enableAutoLogin=>false 'user' => [ 'identityClass' => 'app\models\User', 'authTimeout' => 60 * 60 * 24 * 100, //100 дней для примера ], P. S. It's important to know that this key will work only if enableAutoLogin=>false♪ http://www.yiiframework.com/doc-2.0/yii-web-user.html#$authTimeout-detail

There is a similar formula for FB. It's a little more complicated, but in general, the same approach. It probably doesn't make sense. Can be consulted https://developers.facebook.com/docs/games/gamesonfacebook/login Section "Подписанный запрос"♪

If you used to. php artisan make:auth Then you added a line to the routes. Auth::routes(); It'll be a blessing.

In django-sendfile, different baends can be used to transfer the file itself.Beckends sendfile.backends.development and sendfile.backends.simple return the file to the Django funds, and the whole file logic goes through python and Django.Other bakeds use various tools that transmit to the web server (apache, nginx, lighthttpd) a tool with which file is to be transmitted. In this case, Django provides a special answer with a heading that contains the way to the file and understands the web server, X-Sendfile, Location or X-Accept-Redirect. But such a way requires the web server to support any of the above headings. In such a case, the entire transfer load is on the web server &apos; s shoulders, not Django, and can be used in production.

The problem was that the title of authorization from proxy was transferred to kibana and created a conflict.Refrigerated configuration:server { listen 80; location / { auth_basic "Restricted Access" auth_basic_user_file /etc/nginx/htpasswd.users; proxy_pass http:// 172.17.0.22:5601; proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection 'upgrade'; proxy_set_header Authorization." proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_cache_bypass $http_upgrade; ♪ ♪

I understand that the variable $crypto_pass will take 0 or 1 (false/true) rather than the password itself, so the selter in the OBD system needs to use:SELECT id,username,email_verified FROM " . DB_ACCOUNTS . " WHERE id=$userId AND password='**$hash**'

Please specify for yourself. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F and https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F ♪ And for another. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B2_%D0%98%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5 ♪ In the last one, I'm paying attention to the Digest authentication. Shortly, the client sends the password rather than the password. The server side for the password (from the base) also needs to calculate the hush. Then compare the heshi.At its level, this method ensures security through the use of unilateral mathematical functions.

The mistake was not adding to Valid OAuth redirect URIs line:https://www.facebook.com/connect/login_success.html

You're sending a cross-country ajax request. Accordingly, the browser adds to your request the headline Origin. If the server is ready to work with you (requests from your domain), he must answer to you by adding to the answer the titles of Access-Control-Allow-Origin, which should be domain address or * In this case, the browser finds that the remote server allows you to have a cross-section. Otherwise, the browser will think that the question has ended in error and will cause the processor errors.I've tried to reproduce your code headline, but the server responds to a request without the title of Access-Control-Allow-Origin. That's the problem. In addition, synchronized queries are considered obsolete. Use asynchronous processors. Example: https://jsfiddle.net/

Try to see these systems: http://www.loginradius.com/social-login http://janrain.com/product/social-login

For copying through social media, it's appropriate. https://github.com/sahat/satellizer Integration with:Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, GitHub, Bitbucket, Yahoo, Twitch, Microsoft (Windows Live) OAuth providersDemo: https://satellizer.herokuapp.com