By default, no. Those are files used to render pages on server side. If you will not modify the configuration of where from static files are hosted or the IIS setup (open directory browser feature) you should be secure.

In method Configure Class Startup added app.Map("/products",a => a.UseRequest());

Each repository provides a unit of information: this may be one table or associated tables or another information container.Competences of the Unit Of Work : connect these repository in one logically linked container and contain those tubes that are in the abstract for all repositories. For example, at some point in time, we must preserve the changing Entities. Then u Unit of Work'a should be a method. Save() Here's a piece of code from my real program: public interface IUnitOfWork : IDisposable { IEventRepository Events { get; set; } Task<int> SaveAsync(); int Save(); } //Isolation from Concrete Info Container public interface IRepository<TEntity, TPrimaryType> where TPrimaryType : struct where TEntity : class { Task<TEntity> GetAsync(TPrimaryType id); Task<IEnumerable<TEntity>> GetAllAsync(); IEnumerable<TEntity> Find(Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> predicate); Task&lt;TEntity&gt; SingleOrDefaultAsync(Expression&lt;Func&lt;TEntity, bool&gt;&gt; predicate); Task AddAsync(TEntity entity); Task AddRangeAsync(IEnumerable&lt;TEntity&gt; entities); void Remove(TEntity entity); void RemoveRange(IEnumerable&lt;TEntity&gt; entities); } public class Repository<TEntity, TPrimaryKey> : IRepository<TEntity, TPrimaryKey> where TPrimaryKey : struct where TEntity : class { protected readonly AccreditationDbContext Context; public Repository(AccreditationDbContext context) { Context = context; } /// &lt;summary&gt; /// Gets Item by id /// &lt;/summary&gt; /// &lt;param name="id"&gt;&lt;/param&gt; /// &lt;returns&gt;&lt;/returns&gt; public async Task&lt;TEntity&gt; GetAsync(TPrimaryKey id) { return await Context.Set&lt;TEntity&gt;().FindAsync(id); } /// &lt;summary&gt; /// Get All Data as List /// &lt;/summary&gt; /// &lt;returns&gt;&lt;/returns&gt; public async Task&lt;IEnumerable&lt;TEntity&gt;&gt; GetAllAsync() { return await Context.Set&lt;TEntity&gt;().ToListAsync(); } /// &lt;summary&gt; /// Finds data using Expression tree predicate /// &lt;/summary&gt; /// &lt;param name="predicate"&gt;&lt;/param&gt; /// &lt;returns&gt;&lt;/returns&gt; public IEnumerable&lt;TEntity&gt; Find(Expression&lt;Func&lt;TEntity, bool&gt;&gt; predicate) { return Context.Set&lt;TEntity&gt;().Where(predicate); } /// &lt;summary&gt; /// Gets first item matching predicate /// &lt;/summary&gt; /// &lt;param name="predicate"&gt;&lt;/param&gt; /// &lt;returns&gt;&lt;/returns&gt; public async Task&lt;TEntity&gt; SingleOrDefaultAsync(Expression&lt;Func&lt;TEntity, bool&gt;&gt; predicate) { return await Context.Set&lt;TEntity&gt;().SingleOrDefaultAsync(predicate); } /// &lt;summary&gt; /// Add data to Context /// &lt;/summary&gt; /// &lt;param name="entity"&gt;&lt;/param&gt; public async Task AddAsync(TEntity entity) { await Context.Set&lt;TEntity&gt;().AddAsync(entity); } /// &lt;summary&gt; /// Add data range to Context /// &lt;/summary&gt; /// &lt;param name="entities"&gt;&lt;/param&gt; public async Task AddRangeAsync(IEnumerable&lt;TEntity&gt; entities) { await Context.Set&lt;TEntity&gt;().AddRangeAsync(entities); } /// &lt;summary&gt; /// Remove data from Context /// &lt;/summary&gt; /// &lt;param name="entity"&gt;&lt;/param&gt; public void Remove(TEntity entity) { Context.Set&lt;TEntity&gt;().Remove(entity); } /// &lt;summary&gt; /// Remove range of data from Context /// &lt;/summary&gt; /// &lt;param name="entities"&gt;&lt;/param&gt; public void RemoveRange(IEnumerable&lt;TEntity&gt; entities) { Context.Set&lt;TEntity&gt;().RemoveRange(entities); } } public interface IEventRepository : IRepository<Event,int>,IDbDependency<Event> { //TODO: add Event methods } public class UnitOfWork : IUnitOfWork { private readonly AccreditationDbContext _context; public IEventRepository Events { get; set; } public UnitOfWork(AccreditationDbContext context) { _context = context; Events = new EventRepository(_context); } public void Dispose() { _context.Dispose(); } public async Task&lt;int&gt; SaveAsync() { return await _context.SaveChangesAsync(); } public int Save() { return _context.SaveChanges(); } }

This issue can be solved by: two different means of action need to be created, which will be able to provide specific data for shipment and then to delegate the handling of calls to a common method.For example:public class MyController : Controller { //для ContentType: application/x-www-form-urlencoded [HttpPost] public IActionResult Index(MyClass myclass){ return DoSomething(myclass); } //и для ContentType: application/json [HttpPost] public IActionResult IndexFromBody([FromBody] MyClass myclass){ return DoSomething(myclass); } private IActionResult DoSomething(MyClass myclass){ // сделай тут что нибудь с myclass // ... // ... return Json(myclass); } } Why change?Wasn't there a goodbye before? Maybe, but in the opinion of Damian Edwards in the Standup community, the main reason is security, in particular prevention. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B5%D0%B6%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B9%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B0 ♪UPDATEYou have to solve this problem with routing-, but if you try to depict the two above actions along the same route, it'll be a mistake. The solution would be to create a user route and to challenge the appropriate heading method. I understand that this requires more effort than that, but they say that these changes are for security purposes, I have not learned in depth how this prevents CSRF. You can googling or watch. http://andrewlock.net/model-binding-json-posts-in-asp-net-core/ ♪

First, the packages must be installed IdentityServer4♪ Packages themselves:IdentityServer4 IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation IdentityServer4.AspNetIdentity IdentityServer4.EntityFramework It is further necessary to model: https://gist.github.com/gromanev/4da63142825798927375a3da342e65b8 Again, it's important to compare with official documentation and the proposed code, because I use my services inside that don't lead on the leaflet. And you have to work on defining where my code is and where IdentityServer`a is. Good luck!

You need to add project.json nuget-packet System.Security.Cryptography.Csp:"frameworks": { "netcoreapp1.0": { "dependencies": { "Microsoft.NETCore.App": { "type": "platform", "version": "1.0.0" }, "System.Security.Cryptography.Csp": "4.0.0" }, "imports": "dnxcore50" } } RSACryptoServiceProvider From CoreFX is a little different from a similar class from the mature NET Framework. He has documentation. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/api/system.security.cryptography.rsacryptoserviceprovider ♪

I'm not ready because it's not even about MS. And if this platform is supported by other clouds other than Azure.

Directive @helper She was. https://github.com/aspnet/Razor/pull/323 Razor. Instead, it would have to be either partial or partial. https://docs.asp.net/en/latest/mvc/views/view-components.html ♪Many developers are dissatisfied with this fact, so maybe the hillpers will return in the future.

ASP.NET Core does not yet operate.The thing is, ASP.NET Core was disconnected from ASP.NET, who developed a client's browser based on a client base. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228122(v=vs.100).aspx in the catalogue c:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Config\Browsers\♪Comparing the title User-Agent with the contents of these files, ASP.NET and completed a copy HttpContext.Request.Browser♪ In writing ASP. NET Core just didn't reschedule this function, but maybe Microsoft will add it in the future.So, unfortunately, for the time being, you'll have to manually analyse the contents of the headline to determine the browser. User-Agent:string userAgent = HttpContext.Request.Headers["User-Agent"];

In general, the reference is fully detailed (docs.asp.net/en/latest/publishing/linuxproduction.html). My steps were as follows (Ubuntu 16.04):Establish .net core if not determined;Load the application binary on prod server, make sure it starts. The server turns into Ubuntu, then Kestrel: var host = new WebHostBuilder() .UseKestrel() .UseConfiguration(config) .UseContentRoot(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory()) .UseStartup<Startup.Startup>() .Build(); The article above recommends the use of nginx. Until asp.net is not very friendly with ssl and other things, and nginx can. That's why we put it. Normal routing can also be built: 1. Install: sudo apt-get install nginx 2. Start: sudo service nginx start 3. Check: sudo service nginx statusIn nginx.config (/etc/nginx/nginx.config), routing is built:location /test/gateway/ { rewrite /test/gateway/(.*) /$1 break; proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection keep-alive; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_cache_bypass $http_upgrade; proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:9595; } In proxy_pass, you indicate the way to your annex. I'm still on the same car with a test app and production. So use different URLs for their access. rewrite /test/gateway/(.*) /$1 break; This team changes url by removing /test/gateway/. Thus, access to the test and combat server is only different in the outer url, there is no need to change within the annex.Let's make the app uploaded at the start and overloaded at the fall. Systemctl is used for this. In /etc/systemd/system, create a file app_name.service with the following contents:[Unit] Description=Gateway server for StreetFlow. [Service] TimeoutStartSec=0 ExecStart=/usr/bin/dotnet /etc/bt/st.gateway/GatewayServer.dll WorkingDirectory=/etc/bt/st.gateway Restart=always [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target We're pointing out what team we need to do if we have to make a mistake. It is also possible to indicate dependence, say postgresql or nginx. After the service has been established, two teams have to be performed: sudo systemctl enable your_app sudo systemctl start your_app Sometimes after a change in configuration, the service may not start. It's being treated by a team. sudo systemctl daemon-reload.Congratulations, your app is full!

Is that EF7? Try to change order: var query = this._context.Bottle.Include(b => b.Recipe).ThenInclude(r => r.RecipeAromas).ThenInclude(r => r.Aroma).ThenInclude(r => r.Vendor); query = query.Where(u => u.CreatedUserId == userId).Skip(gridParams.PageSize * gridParams.Page).Take(gridParams.PageSize);

Try to make a clear connection.e.HasOne(r => r.Type).WithMany(t => t.Reminders) .HasForeignKey(r => r.TypeId).WillCascadeOnDelete(false); If cascade disposal is necessary, we shall, instead of false, be true

Turns out ASP. NET nucleus does not support the serialization of the model (from ModelStateEntry, containing exceptions).So you can't show the TempData model. And as it says, https://github.com/aspnet/Mvc/issues/4190 there are no plans to change that behaviour.It was therefore necessary to write its own decision:public class SetTempDataModelStateAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute { public override void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext filterContext) { base.OnActionExecuted(filterContext); Controller controller = filterContext.Controller as Controller; if (controller != null) { controller.TempData["ModelState"] = controller.ViewData.ModelState; } } } public class RestoreModelStateFromTempDataAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute { public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext) { base.OnActionExecuting(filterContext); Controller controller = filterContext.Controller as Controller; if (controller != null &amp; controller.TempData.ContainsKey("ModelState")) { controller.ViewData.ModelState.Merge( (ModelStateDictionary)controller.TempData["ModelState"]); } } }

If you get the Id in the counteraller, write as follows:using Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc; public class UserController : Controller { public IActionResult Info() { var userId = User.GetUserId(); var userName = User.GetUserName(); return View(); } } The submissions should include:using System.Security.Claims And write:<div> @User.GetUserId() @User.GetUserName() </div> Through the Context, submissions can be:<div> @Context.User.GetUserId() @Context.User.GetUserName() </div> Through the Context in the Controller: using Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc; public class UserController : Controller { public IActionResult Info() { var userId = HttpContext.User.GetUserId(); var userName = HttpContext.User.GetUserName(); return View(); } } In your own classes, you can't use these functions.

Decision:[HttpPost] public IActionResult AddPost(ViewPost model) { return Content($"Name: {model.name} Post: {model.post}"); } i.e. replacement ViewPost post ♪ ViewPost model

That he didn't try string and stream and HtpRequestMessage and stuff.And it was easier, object.

If you're using ASP.NET Core MVC architecture, you'll set up a class in the NET 6 project that describes your model.account: {id: 1, email: "some@some.com", idRoles: [1, 3], password: "12345", isActive: true} Describe clearly in your UI with the Razor code, in the first line of the code, the reference to the model by adding a @ sign. Next, your type of method, the name of the controller and the method to which the data are transmitted.<form method="put" asp-controller="Название контроллера" asp-action="Change"> // какая то логика </form>Here. https://github.com/AndyBrizhak/Rocky , for ASP.NET Core MVC at NET 5, the same link to the video. So you can make a beauty on React, but if you're gonna make him friends with NET Core, you're gonna have to figure out how he works.

You must have an interface. IMessageSender has a rig more accessible than publicThat's why he can't be transferred. public function Configure♪ At least a mistake talks about it.Actually, it's weird that you're doing this, default interfaces have access. publicThat's right. Public contract In fact, what's the point in the interface if it doesn't have access to it from?All right, put it in the interface description. IMessageSender I'd like to see if you wrote it.private or protectedYou know, or you' do it. public♪

For the transmission of any form on the page, the first line of the code shows the model with which the presentation will work.The submission should clearly indicate that this is a form for data entry, adding a line form method="post"<div class="container"> <form method="post" asp-controller="Название контроллера" asp-action="PaymentPost"> <div> // какой то код <input asp-for="Payment" class="form-control" /> </div> <input class="button" type="submit" value="Передать что-либо" /> </form> </div>In your model, you could add a characteristic that would store the amount that the polygrapher paid. public int Payment { get; set; }In the counteraller, other than the method of the kind of Get, a post-type method that can be called PaymentPost is needed. Something like that.public IActionResult PaymentPost(int Payment) {/* логика обработки, полученного результата Payment */ return RedirectToAction("Index");}In the end, you need to deal with ASP. NET Core before trying to use it. Right here. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLePGPxR0FDm9NehG1_SkN5ahKL6Q_ozPR which briefly describes how ASP works. NET Core, here's a repository with a code for https://github.com/AndyBrizhak/Rocky On .NET 5,

We can and should use it because, for example, standard Microsoft.AspNet.Identity uses Razor Pages. Here. https://github.com/AndyBrizhak/Rocky In the repository of the work code, for the internet store on ASP.NET Core MVC for NET 5, where the identification and authorisation is based on standard and additional Razor-pages. Thus, one annex uses a route for Razor and MVC.