JOB DESCRIPTION ExampleCompany is looking for a Test Automation Engineer to join our growing team! The Test Automation Engineer will work as part of a passionate agile project team to ensure quality is driven into the heart of the development process. She/he will be involved throughout the development lifecycle with particular responsibility in the quality assurance of software development and deployment, with emphasis on development and implementation of test automation. ABOUT THIS JOB Job type: Remote, Full-time Experience level: Middle Role: Automation QA/Test Developer Industry: Information Technology, Software Development, Software Engineering Company size: 201–500 people Company type: Private REQUIREMENTS: Knowledge of software and automated testing architecture Experience in Software Testing Excellent QA skills (design test plan and test strategy, writing test cases, executing test cases, opening bugs, verifying bugs) Excellent knowledge of web automation using Selenium Excellent knowledge of test frameworks (Xunit, Nunit, TestNG) Knowledge of mobile automation frameworks (Xamarin.UITest, Appium, XCUITest, Espresso) Experience in mobile testing, performance testing and load testing Experience of working in agile environment Demonstrates good level of Development skills and knowledge: Development Methodology OOP Concept and Principles OOP Programing Languages: C# Scripting Languages: PowerShell Web Design Technologies: HTML5, CSS3 Database Technologies: SQL Troubleshooting Familiar with concept of version control system Familiar with concept of continuous testing Development IDE: MS Visual Studio Excellent written and spoken English Strong analytical skills and attention to detail Ability to think outside the box and look for ways to make the testing process more efficient Capable of learning new skills quickly Excellent team spirit and team work BONUS SKILLS: Knowledge of agile methodologies (SCRUM) Experience using team collaboration tools/source control programs, preferably Team Foundation EDUCATION: Bachelor's degree in Computer Science, Software Engineering or related field would be of great value Please send your CV to job@example.com

ABOUT THIS FREELANCE JOB More than 30 hrs/week Project Length: More than 6 months Expertise level: Intermediate $10.00-$12.00 per hour We are looking for a experience testers to test some mobile apps. We are looking for someone who can double check everything to make sure that everything works properly. Candidates should have good communication skills and must have prior mobile testing experience. Please send your CV to job@example.com

ExampleCompany - is a leading QA services company providing a full suite of QA testing services to help you release better software faster. With a team of over 800 engineering experts located in both offshore and nearshore locations, it has been providing software testing services to help Fortune 500 companies and startups since 2000. A few of its clients include Ford, Oracle, Prudential, eBay, Target, Facebook, and IBM. Our Team Offers Multiple Software Testing Services: Functional Testing Mobile Testing Security Testing Automation Testing Usability Testing Integration Testing Localization Testing Performance Testing Our Experts Use the Following Software Testing and QA Tools: Selenium SoapUI Postman Appium Java TestComplete JIRA JMeter TestLink Xcode Fake GPS TestFlight Crashlytics iMazing Cucumber Smartphone Test Farm Talk to Us: Email: sales@example.com Phone: +1 111 111 11 11

ExampleConf Testing Conference Online will take place over two days and will include a mix of 2-hour live workshops, 1-hour prerecorded sessions with live Q&A, and demos from the Example sponsors. As usual, we has brought together some of the most talented practitioners and industry experts to lead these workshops and sessions. Can’t join the live event? Not to worry as your registration provides you with secure access to the recorded workshops and sessions for 90 days following the end of the conference – watch at your convenience until the end of 2020! 8+ SPEAKERS 4 TUTORIALS 6 SESSIONS TOPICS Test Management AI in Testing Performance Testing Security Testing Agile Testing Mobile Testing Test Automation Cloud Testing All Workshops & Sessions - Regular Price: $195.00 Follow the link: Register Now!

ABOUT THIS ONLINE COURSE Length: 8 weeks Effort: 2 hours per day Price: $299 Start Date: September 29, 2020 120 hours long project-based course, you will learn: Writing test automation scripts using Selenium to automation an e-commerce website Interacting with web elements like text box, dropdown select, buttons, lists Performing Mouse operations (Action Class) Performing operations using Javascripts via Selenium Writing XPaths for dynamic web elements Java programming Basics Building core automation framework Lecturer: Linkedin: John Smith Test Automation Architect and DevOps Specialist Follow the link to register and apply for this course - Enroll me!

I could see a shadow DOM in your webpage and in that case you have to use .shadow()(Cypress Docs). Your code would look something like: cy.get('view-login').shadow().find('input[data-field="username"]').type('username', {force: true}) cy.get('view-login').shadow().find('input[data-field="password"]').type('password', {force: true}) cy.get('view-login').shadow().find('input[value="personal"]').click() cy.get('view-login').shadow().find('.ViewLogin__button').click()

I would say that is the lowest possible severity, but that might vary depending on the rules of your team or some specifics about the app. For example, a factor that might make that a high severity bug is when font colors are part of a brand or something like national flag colors or similar where changing colors might significantly change the user perception of the app. Another example is accessibility and readability. Some colors might not work with other colors on the page so changing them might alter usability of the app for certain categories of users.

Some prefer to use HttpClient because it is already built into the framework. So there's no need to add extra bloat to your project. RestSharp, like any library, is easier to use because someone already did the hard work and ironed out the problems gotten along the way. I have used both, and the one is not better than the another. It just depends on your use-case, situation and environment. I had a WebAPI proxy project that needed to call another REST API. I chose RestSharp at first because I was already familiar with it from using it in another project. However, I changed to HttpClient eventually because it uses the same return types as the WebAPI controllers, so it just saved me time from having to convert RestSharp's responses back to a HttpResponseMessage. Of course each one has its pros and cons, it just boils down to your use-case.

Agree. Faced same condition before. As experienced earlier few things might help you at some extend. You need to convey them the pros & cons of the automation testing. You need to give them a brief about the use of automation as well. I mean with lesser knowledge one can expect to much from you. You need to take initiatives to keep balance between actual possible things to automate and expectations As per my knowledge, In your case of browser automation we can ensure that everything is working well 24*7. This is a primary goal of browser automation. Communicate clearly if we are not bothering about things should work ALWAYS then we should think of reduce the dependency & efforts on browser automation Limitations: Its really out of scope [as of now at lease] to automate browser to catch images or content overlapping, veriication of image quality and visibility, crosschecking on different versions of browser in [responsive] website

Not only the server need to be able to respond fast enough, JMeter must be able to send requests fast enough as well. Default JMeter configuration is suitable for tests development and debugging and creating some load (rather limited though), you need to properly tune your JMeter instance in order to fully utilize your machine resources If your single machine is not powerful enough to conduct the required load it's possible to run JMeter in distributed mode using as many load generators as needed in order to create the necessary number of virtual users/requests per second

You conduct usability testing: To find problems in complex processes To collect unbiased user opinions To get insights that improve the overall user experience

There are various of security tools. If I were you I'd download system called BackTrack - www.backtrack-linux.org which has plenty of them. You can test almost everything, including sociotechnics, security of application, security of server, security of network etc. every kind of "security" has its own tools. There is one good software that tests website against security called SET more on http://www.backtrack-linux.org/backtrack/social-engineering-toolkit-training/ If you want test WEB sites you should check this video http://vimeo.com/21631598 There are plenty of tools to scan websites you will get them when you download the system I've given you link above. There is one more powerful tool to use -> http://www.metasploit.com/ you can read more about it on this site. Hope I've helped

Of course it includes date & time format for different countries. Its the most irritating part of localization testing for me)

The where clause is redundant. You can just add all to a single query: select count(column1), count(column2), . . . count(column20) from t

I think the condition attribute is missing: - task: PublishTestResults@2 inputs: failTaskOnFailedTests: false testRunner: VSTest testResultsFiles: '**/*.trx' searchFolder: '$(Build.Repository.LocalPath)' condition: succeededOrFailed() From the documentation: In this YAML, PublishTestResults@2 will run even if the previous step fails because of the succeededOrFailed()

List of Software Test Estimation Techniques you can use: Work Breakdown Structure 3-Point Software Testing Estimation Technique Wideband Delphi technique Function Point/Testing Point Analysis Use – Case Point Method Percentage distribution Ad-hoc method

Manual QA, more commonly known as Blackbox QA, is far from dead. It's true that unit tests and general automated tests can cover at least 90% of code-path testing. What many don't realize is that the last manual 10% can be the some of the most important work a software and hardware organization can do. Let's take the user interface, for example. A unit test can tell you that a check box is placed in the right location, and turns on and off as expected. What the test can't tell you is that it's horribly bitmapped and looks terrible with the hideous purple and yellow color scheme in the application. The most important reason for Blackbox QA is that you end up with strong customer advocate inside your organization. Many of these QA people (myself included), have more of a creative background than a programming background. While some may think of this as a failing, these are the people who don't care about how the code works - they care about how the product works. They spend time thinking like a customer, rather than a developer; "Oh, my almost dead iPod is finished syncing, that means I can close my laptop and just let it charge. Yup, and then I'll just pull it out when my machine is asleep (even though I was playing music from it on my computer) and everything will be fine." Developers and testers know how a product is supposed to work, and all exercise a product to specification. It's a good tester's job to use the product in a careless way, to make sure that bad stuff doesn't happen. Yank a USB drive from a computer while you're copying data, are you crazy?!? Sure, that's a really stupid idea. But people do it all the time. And a good QA person will do just that, to make sure that pulling a hard drive doesn't take a whole system down. Or turning off WiFi when downloading a movie, or syncing music while purchasing new content and then changing your account password and email address at the same time. Or installing an OS on an MP3 player and trying to boot from it, then pulling the player from the system while it's booted from the device (Yup, I did that, and found a really good bug from it).

SOFTWARE-TESTING.COM collects and processes your personal information. Collecting data from users During the registration step you were asked to provide a username and email address, you can also optionally provide additional information to complete your user profile on this website. If you use Facebook or Google registration process, you will provide your first name, last name, email and profile picture to create your user account. Sharing your personal information We use this information strictly to personalize your experience in SOFTWARE-TESTING.COM community, as well as to associate the posts you make to your user account. We do not sell, trade, or rent Users personal identification information to others. We retain this information for the life of your user account, and you are able to withdraw consent at any time by deleting your account. Your acceptance of these terms By using SOFTWARE-TESTING.COM, you signify your acceptance of this policy and terms of service. If you do not agree to this policy, please do not use our site. Your continued use of the site following the posting of changes to this policy will be deemed your acceptance of those changes. Contacting us If you have any questions or concerns, we encourage you to reach out to this forum's administrative team via email info@software-testing.com