JOB DESCRIPTION ExampleCompany is looking for a Test Automation Engineer to join our growing team! The Test Automation Engineer will work as part of a passionate agile project team to ensure quality is driven into the heart of the development process. She/he will be involved throughout the development lifecycle with particular responsibility in the quality assurance of software development and deployment, with emphasis on development and implementation of test automation. ABOUT THIS JOB Job type: Remote, Full-time Experience level: Middle Role: Automation QA/Test Developer Industry: Information Technology, Software Development, Software Engineering Company size: 201–500 people Company type: Private REQUIREMENTS: Knowledge of software and automated testing architecture Experience in Software Testing Excellent QA skills (design test plan and test strategy, writing test cases, executing test cases, opening bugs, verifying bugs) Excellent knowledge of web automation using Selenium Excellent knowledge of test frameworks (Xunit, Nunit, TestNG) Knowledge of mobile automation frameworks (Xamarin.UITest, Appium, XCUITest, Espresso) Experience in mobile testing, performance testing and load testing Experience of working in agile environment Demonstrates good level of Development skills and knowledge: Development Methodology OOP Concept and Principles OOP Programing Languages: C# Scripting Languages: PowerShell Web Design Technologies: HTML5, CSS3 Database Technologies: SQL Troubleshooting Familiar with concept of version control system Familiar with concept of continuous testing Development IDE: MS Visual Studio Excellent written and spoken English Strong analytical skills and attention to detail Ability to think outside the box and look for ways to make the testing process more efficient Capable of learning new skills quickly Excellent team spirit and team work BONUS SKILLS: Knowledge of agile methodologies (SCRUM) Experience using team collaboration tools/source control programs, preferably Team Foundation EDUCATION: Bachelor's degree in Computer Science, Software Engineering or related field would be of great value Please send your CV to job@example.com

ABOUT THIS FREELANCE JOB More than 30 hrs/week Project Length: More than 6 months Expertise level: Intermediate $10.00-$12.00 per hour We are looking for a experience testers to test some mobile apps. We are looking for someone who can double check everything to make sure that everything works properly. Candidates should have good communication skills and must have prior mobile testing experience. Please send your CV to job@example.com

ExampleCompany - is a leading QA services company providing a full suite of QA testing services to help you release better software faster. With a team of over 800 engineering experts located in both offshore and nearshore locations, it has been providing software testing services to help Fortune 500 companies and startups since 2000. A few of its clients include Ford, Oracle, Prudential, eBay, Target, Facebook, and IBM. Our Team Offers Multiple Software Testing Services: Functional Testing Mobile Testing Security Testing Automation Testing Usability Testing Integration Testing Localization Testing Performance Testing Our Experts Use the Following Software Testing and QA Tools: Selenium SoapUI Postman Appium Java TestComplete JIRA JMeter TestLink Xcode Fake GPS TestFlight Crashlytics iMazing Cucumber Smartphone Test Farm Talk to Us: Email: sales@example.com Phone: +1 111 111 11 11

ExampleConf Testing Conference Online will take place over two days and will include a mix of 2-hour live workshops, 1-hour prerecorded sessions with live Q&A, and demos from the Example sponsors. As usual, we has brought together some of the most talented practitioners and industry experts to lead these workshops and sessions. Can’t join the live event? Not to worry as your registration provides you with secure access to the recorded workshops and sessions for 90 days following the end of the conference – watch at your convenience until the end of 2020! 8+ SPEAKERS 4 TUTORIALS 6 SESSIONS TOPICS Test Management AI in Testing Performance Testing Security Testing Agile Testing Mobile Testing Test Automation Cloud Testing All Workshops & Sessions - Regular Price: $195.00 Follow the link: Register Now!

ABOUT THIS ONLINE COURSE Length: 8 weeks Effort: 2 hours per day Price: $299 Start Date: September 29, 2020 120 hours long project-based course, you will learn: Writing test automation scripts using Selenium to automation an e-commerce website Interacting with web elements like text box, dropdown select, buttons, lists Performing Mouse operations (Action Class) Performing operations using Javascripts via Selenium Writing XPaths for dynamic web elements Java programming Basics Building core automation framework Lecturer: Linkedin: John Smith Test Automation Architect and DevOps Specialist Follow the link to register and apply for this course - Enroll me!

You have most probably not added the proper dependencies. Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/a/61429938 I suggest looking into this response for the steps to do so with a dependency management tool, like Maven: https://stackoverflow.com/a/3167378

For starters, don't pass to your client the impression that you can document all your testing, because testing is a performance, not artifact generation. It is made of both explicit and tacit knowledge, including tacit oracles, which can't be described down. Now, changing the question to "how to communicate the information I've uncovered during testing?": Easiest and more complete way: Record your testing and express your thinking process along the way. This is known as Testopsy; You can fill out a charter of your testing sessions (possible template here), followed by debriefing session; You can pair with your client during your testing; You can describe specific actions and outcomes in sequential order, attempting to encode all the thought process you had during your testing. Speaking of the last point, unless your context really calls for this type of solution, I would suggest to not go this way. If the idea of encoding a human thought process doesn't seem absurd and misleading to you, I would suggest reading this blog post series.

Welcome. You need to read the documentation in detail, it shows an example of a request body for PUT method: { "name":"test1", "salary":"1123", "age":"23" } There is no employee_ in the names of the attributes. So an example flow could look like this: 1) create an employee with POST method: URL: /api/v1/create req body: { "name": "DorisWan", "salary": "50000", "age": "25" } res body: { "status":"success", "data":{ "name":"DorisWan", "salary":"50000", "age":"25", "id":47 } } 2) update the employee with PUT method: URL: /api/v1/update/47 See how I took the id from the previous response body and put it into the URL. req body: { "name": "Doris", "salary": "60000", "age": "26" } res body: { "status":"success", "data":{ "employee_name":"Doris", "employee_salary":"60000", "employee_age":"26", "id":47 } }

Protractor supports all webdriverjs keys https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/docs/api/javascript/module/selenium-webdriver/index_exports_Key.html HOME is one of them , you can use these in protractor using hte "protractor" global function protractor.key.HOME and could be used with sendKeys element.sendKeys(protractor.key.HOME) browser.actions().sendKeys(protractor.Key.HOME).perform();

Exploratory testing Not following the rules of the game Playing in the wrong order Trying different functionalities everywhere Different strategies like minimum/maximum input

Define a local JMeter property this way: -J[prop_name]=[value] In your case it may be : jmeter -n -t WebDriverSampler.jmx -JChromeDriverPath=c:\soft\webdriver\chromedriver.exe Read defined properties in JMeter with function _P and use it in "Chrome" tab of jp@gc - Chrome Driver Config: ${__P(ChromeDriverPath)} You can pass and use any parameters this way. Do not forget to put a default value in case you run the script without passing that JMeter property like: ${__P(ChromeDriverPath,c:\soft\webdriver\chromedriver.exe)}

I have read two great books written by Steve Krug, which I think are a must read for anyone doing usability testing. Don't Make Me Think Rocket Surgery Made Easy Both are easy to read and you should be able to read both in a day (or two). Maybe also ask the question on https://ux.stackexchange.com/, guess that community might have better getting started pointers.

A lot of stuff covered by OWASP applies to applications as the line between desktop app and web app blurs. Things like SQL injection, command injection, object injection to name a few injection attacks. I once tested a .Net MVC app by uploading a PHP file and tried to see if the code was executed or presented as raw text when viewed. As far as tools you could try a free product like Metasploit but the learning curve is steep.

It depends on what exactly you are trying to check. If you are wondering how the app would behave in that specific territory and/or specific mobile service operator, then you have two other options: - Crowdtesting; You can basically hire remote testers from a specific country which will have specific mobile service providers SIM cards. it will be quite cheap if you want to do for example one test case, or short exploratory testing session. For example: http://www.utest.com/ https://www.testcloud.io/ http://www.testbirds.com/ https://crowdsourcedtesting.com/ https://www.pay4bugs.com/ http://www.mob4hire.com/ https://mycrowd.com/ https://test.io/ https://usabilityhub.com/ https://globalapptesting.com/ https://www.bugfinders.com/ http://www.usertesting.com/ http://whatusersdo.com/ http://trymyui.com/ - Mobile Device Labs; So, there are many MDL services that allow you to use mobile devices which are in Poland, Germany, USA, Japan, China or so. Apart from a specific location from Play Store and Internet providers perspective, some of them allows you to use local SIM cards that are already configured in devices. For example: TestDroid TestObject (Sauce labs) Perfecto Mobile NativeTap Kobiton Amazon AWS Device farm Google FireBase Xamarin Test Cloud Experitest Samsung Developers Lab pCloudy BrowserStack

I don't think you should be testing each and every record in the database, I would rather suggest considering the following testing types: Positive testing: use criteria which definitely return result. If your application doesn't have "static" scenarios it can be substituted with Fuzz Testing or Pairwise Testing Boundary testing: depending on your application specifics use boundary inputs to check edge conditions and how does your application handles them Negative testing: your application should not display anything when criteria not matching any db data are given Security testing: ensure that non-privileged users cannot see the data they should not be seeing. You can put testing against any forms of SQL injections here as well. Load Testing: you need to ensure that your application works well under the anticipated load. Additionally you can perform stress testing and soak testing to see how it behaves under prolonged load and where it starts to break. If it makes sense to invest into automation (i.e. the time required for automation will be less than the aggregate time of all anticipated executions) it is better to go for it, moreover load testing assumes automation.

If you want to roll your own bash script you can model it on mine at https://durrantm.wordpress.com/2015/04/02/tdd-for-sh/ See below. So you could do something like: # Define the function $ check_git () { git grep '>>>>> HEAD' && return 1; return 0; } # Call the function $ check_git # do something based on return code - $? # "To check the exit code we can simply print the $? special variable in bash. # This variable will print the exit code of the last run command" The code below is the full detail of my code which essentially lets you use do_test some_bash_function expected_result other_param1 other_param2 ... Code: #!/usr/bin/env bash . colors_for_text.sh 2> /dev/null do_test () { if [[ $# -eq 0 ]]; then printf "$fail_color Error - do_test: No parameters provided - Usage is do_test [function_name] \$LINENO [expected result] [optional params]\n" exit 1 elif [[ $# -eq 1 ]]; then printf "$fail_color Error - do_test: Two parameters missing - \$LINENO and expected result (other params as needed)\n" exit 1 fi declare -ig test_runs test_passes test_fails local -r function="$1";shift local -r line_number="$1";shift local failfast="False" local debug="False" local verbose="False" local test_description= local test_matcher= local expected= local pass_on_params= local command_not_found=False type "setup" &> /dev/null && setup # TODO Replace with for loop (initial attempts failed) [[ "$1" == "failfast" ]] && failfast="True" && shift [[ "$1" == "debug" ]] && debug="True" && shift [[ "$1" == "verbose" ]] && verbose="True" && shift [[ "$1" == "failfast" ]] && failfast="True" && shift [[ "$1" == "debug" ]] && debug="True" && shift [[ "$1" == "failfast" ]] && failfast="True" && shift if [[ "$1" =~ ^description= ]]; then [[ `echo $1 | grep =` ]] && test_description=`echo $1 | sed 's/.*=//'`' ' && shift fi if [[ "$1" =~ ^matcher= ]]; then [[ `echo "$1" | grep =` ]] && test_matcher="`echo "$1" | sed 's/matcher=//'`" && shift fi if [[ $# -eq 0 ]]; then printf "$fail_color Error - Function: $function, Line: $line_number \n do_test: Third parameter missing - expected result\n" exit 1 fi expected="$1";shift pass_on_params="$@" $function ${pass_on_params[@]} 2> $TMPDIR"/output$$-"$test_runs".txt" cat $TMPDIR"/output$$-"$test_runs".txt" | grep -i "command not found" && command_not_found=True debug_printf "(debug)" if [[ $command_not_found == "True" ]]; then record_script_failure "$function" elif [[ "$test_matcher" == "==" ]]; then [[ "$result" == $expected ]] && record_test_success "$function" || record_test_failure "$function"; elif [[ "$expected" =~ ^-?[0-9]+$ ]]; then [[ "$result" -eq $expected ]] && record_test_success "$function" || record_test_failure "$function"; else [[ "$result" == $expected ]] && record_test_success "$function" || record_test_failure "$function"; fi test_runs+=1 } record_test_success () { [[ $# -eq 0 ]] && no_param_quit $FUNCNAME local -r function="$1" printf "$pass_color"."$color_end" [[ "$verbose" == "True" ]] && printf "$function" test_passes+=1 } record_test_failure () { [[ $# -eq 0 ]] && no_param_quit $FUNCNAME local -r function="$1" test_fails+=1 printf "$fail_color"F"$color_end" function_exists? "$function" && error_messages=$error_messages"$fail_color""$test_description""Line: $line_number - \ '$function ${pass_on_params[@]}' failed:\n\ Expected: $expected\n\ Received: $result $color_end\n\n" || error_messages=$error_messages"$fail_color""Line: $line_number: \ Function '$function' is undefined\n" [[ "$failfast" == "True" ]] && failfast "Test" $error_messages } record_script_failure () { [[ $# -eq 0 ]] && no_param_quit $FUNCNAME local -r function="$1" test_fails+=1 err=`cat $TMPDIR"/output$$-"$test_runs".txt"` printf $err error_messages=$error_messages"$fail_color""Line: $line_number: \ Error within function '$function', getting \"command not found\" in $err \n" [[ "$failfast" == "True" ]] && failfast "Script" $error_messages } failfast () { printf "\n$1 error & failfast set to exit immediately.\n$2\n" && exit 1 } no_param_quit () { printf "\nError - 1 parameter required for: $1 - exiting\n" && exit 1 } function_exists?() { declare -f -F $1 > /dev/null return $? } debug_echo () { [[ "$debug" == "True" ]] && echo "$1" } debug_printf () { [[ "$debug" == "True" ]] && printf "$1" }

First, I would probably suggest that if one really follows Agile development approach, there should be no Test team. In many companies, there's a belief that Agile is only about boards, Jira, iteration and fancy "ceremonies" instead of old "meetings". It is not the case, Agile approach is inherently different (and, actually, not always required, which is not widely acknowledged and accepted idea, unfortunately (yet?)) Usually, one would have an Agile team working on one or several connected products. This team may (or may not) contain a test specialist. In a truly Agile environment, test specialist is not the one who performs all the testing (the same as front-end developer is not the one who performs all front-end development activities), but the one whose primary skill is testing. In Agile world, testing is a whole team activity an responsibility. Test-specialist would coach, pair, help other team members to do their part of testing. Tester would not baby-sit other team members and do all the testing for them. Think of Agile team as an elite Marine squad. If combat engineer is busy, does it mean that the whole squad would wait while he/she defuses all bombs one by one, just shooting around, to keep themselves busy? That is a very good analogy because the answer "it depends". Same with any specialised activity in an Agile team. As a part of my master thesis, I have completed research, which showed that rotation and unstable Agile team is a huge instability factor, hindering efficiency and decreasing quality. I would suggest avoiding rotation if at all possible. It means you may want a test engineer(s) to be permanent members of a product team. One critical thing to understand in an Agile-environment, is that testing is not separate from development. I.e. saying that "tester is part of the sprint planning"/"testing is part of a sprint" is like stating the obvious. The feature is not developed unless it is tested, period. If feature is not tested - it is not the testers problem, it is the team problem.

Manual QA, more commonly known as Blackbox QA, is far from dead. It's true that unit tests and general automated tests can cover at least 90% of code-path testing. What many don't realize is that the last manual 10% can be the some of the most important work a software and hardware organization can do. Let's take the user interface, for example. A unit test can tell you that a check box is placed in the right location, and turns on and off as expected. What the test can't tell you is that it's horribly bitmapped and looks terrible with the hideous purple and yellow color scheme in the application. The most important reason for Blackbox QA is that you end up with strong customer advocate inside your organization. Many of these QA people (myself included), have more of a creative background than a programming background. While some may think of this as a failing, these are the people who don't care about how the code works - they care about how the product works. They spend time thinking like a customer, rather than a developer; "Oh, my almost dead iPod is finished syncing, that means I can close my laptop and just let it charge. Yup, and then I'll just pull it out when my machine is asleep (even though I was playing music from it on my computer) and everything will be fine." Developers and testers know how a product is supposed to work, and all exercise a product to specification. It's a good tester's job to use the product in a careless way, to make sure that bad stuff doesn't happen. Yank a USB drive from a computer while you're copying data, are you crazy?!? Sure, that's a really stupid idea. But people do it all the time. And a good QA person will do just that, to make sure that pulling a hard drive doesn't take a whole system down. Or turning off WiFi when downloading a movie, or syncing music while purchasing new content and then changing your account password and email address at the same time. Or installing an OS on an MP3 player and trying to boot from it, then pulling the player from the system while it's booted from the device (Yup, I did that, and found a really good bug from it).

SOFTWARE-TESTING.COM collects and processes your personal information. Collecting data from users During the registration step you were asked to provide a username and email address, you can also optionally provide additional information to complete your user profile on this website. If you use Facebook or Google registration process, you will provide your first name, last name, email and profile picture to create your user account. Sharing your personal information We use this information strictly to personalize your experience in SOFTWARE-TESTING.COM community, as well as to associate the posts you make to your user account. We do not sell, trade, or rent Users personal identification information to others. We retain this information for the life of your user account, and you are able to withdraw consent at any time by deleting your account. Your acceptance of these terms By using SOFTWARE-TESTING.COM, you signify your acceptance of this policy and terms of service. If you do not agree to this policy, please do not use our site. Your continued use of the site following the posting of changes to this policy will be deemed your acceptance of those changes. Contacting us If you have any questions or concerns, we encourage you to reach out to this forum's administrative team via email info@software-testing.com